|
Daily news


 |
OHB - A column by Marco Fuchs:
Thoughts on time and space
I strongly believe in the
Rocket Factory. A withdrawal is out of the question
WITHOUT ROCKETS THERE IS NO
SPACE TRAVEL. WHY NOW IS THE TIME FOR THE
MICROLAUNCHER.
Without rockets, there can be
no space travel. At first glance, this seems to be a
banal realization, after all, every child who would
like to become an astronaut knows that he has to get
into a rocket to leave the earth in the direction of
space. Nevertheless, we in Europe have been dealing
for some time with the question of how we want to do
space travel in the future, and sometimes seem to be
conducting an academic debate that cannot disguise
the harsh reality: if we do not have access to
space, then we cannot do space travel. From the
perspective of the satellite manufacturer, I see the
problems we currently have with limited European
access to space in the form of unlaunched Galileo
satellites on the farm every day.
As of March 2023, Europe still
has two Ariane 5 launchers. One will launch the
European Jupiter mission Juice in April, the last
Ariane 5 will take off in June, carrying the German
Telekom mission Heinrich Hertz and the French
satellite Syracuse 4B. Ariane 5 has been Europe's
reliable workhorse for almost 30 years and has also
been successful in the commercial international
market due to its reliability and high payload
capacity; With MT Aerospace AG, we have the largest
German supplier in the OHB Group and I have
therefore been able to experience the success story
of the Ariane 5 up close. In addition, a second
European development for smaller payloads was
established with the Vega. Complemented by the
Europeanized Soyuz missile, Europe had a comfortable
missile portfolio in relation to actual
institutional needs. Clearly, it was also a
political signal that independent European access to
space was ensured at all times, but cooperations
such as the one with the Soyuz or the launch of
NASA's James Webb telescope were lived and desired
practice.
Of these golden times, we are
left with many spectacular launches and, of course,
successful satellite missions, because that's what
it's all about: the rocket is the means of transport
for the satellite or the probe or, in the supreme
discipline, the people, the launcher is not an end
in itself, but must first and foremost meet the
needs of its passengers. Of course, the price always
plays a role, and here SpaceX has a decisive
advantage over the other launchers, as the market
price is unbeatably low due to the lean industrial
approach and the reusability of the Falcon 9. The
now expected first orbital flight of the fully
reusable super-heavy-lift rocket Starship will
increase this price pressure immensely.
The Ariane 6 as the successor
model to the Ariane 5 is in crisis, until the first
launch will pass in my estimation at least another
year. The fact that the development of new launchers
and demanding space missions cannot be squeezed into
tight schedules is not a European realization,
everywhere in the world these developments take
longer and are becoming more expensive
(incidentally, quite decisively due to the increased
expenditure of time). Space travel is a
technologically challenging and very risky
discipline, not least where the attraction and
fascination of the whole thing lies. Ariane 6 will
serve as Europe's cargo rocket for large missions,
and I have no doubt about that. The fact that the
smaller Vega and the Vega-C are currently only
available in small numbers due to essential
components of their upper stages, which the
manufacturer Avio obtains from the Ukraine, is
currently papered over by the last false launches of
the Vega rocket - as a result, however, the smaller
European rocket is also on the ground.
Is now the time for the
microlauncher? Yes, I am convinced of it, and with
the successful tests that the Rocket Factory
Augsburg has completed in the last six months, we
are really well on the way to the first test flight
in the next few months with the RFA ONE. In parallel
with the technical advances, the institutional
market is also preparing for the microlaunchers, as
was clearly demonstrated by the joint declaration of
the governments of France, Germany and Italy at the
last ESA Ministerial Council Conference in November
2022. There it was agreed that European
microlaunchers should be approved for the launch of
ESA satellites, a really important step to make the
privately financed rockets with institutional anchor
customer orders attractive for commercial customers
and above all investors. The founding of the Rocket
Factory Augsburg in 2018 was the right decision at
the right time, and already five years ago it was
the declared goal that the rocket from Augsburg
should make a competitive offer for access to space.
In order to achieve this, the
customer base must be as large and broad as
possible, and the missile must be cheap in addition
to high reliability and scalability of payload
capabilities. In the end, Rocket Factory Augsburg
must be an independent and self-sustaining company
in the European market environment. This was the
declared goal right from the start, otherwise we
would have been able to establish it directly as a
subsidiary of the OHB Group. I am firmly convinced
that the start-up approach is the right way to get a
new and innovative perspective on the development
and production of the rocket. This approach also
includes the financing instruments that are
successfully applied to tech start-ups around the
world. Of course, investors and partners who do not
come from space travel must also invest in the
company, which becomes quite clear when you look at
the other microlauncher companies and above all the
clientele that the small launchers want to address.
I firmly believe in XRF and together with OHB we
will definitely accompany the development of the
rocket on its way to success. Of course, we will not
withdraw from the Rocket Factory, but will
consistently continue along the path of opening up
to further investors, a withdrawal is out of the
question. The original idea, namely the expertise of
the satellite manufacturer and the experience of
rocket parts production, which OHB contributes to
RFA as a strategic core investor, has not changed,
and the development of the market and the changed
political conditions in Europe reinforce this
strategy.
|
|
|
|